When EBM wins over L-PBF
EBM runs at ~700 °C build chamber temperature and uses an electron beam in vacuum. The pre-heat eliminates almost all residual stress (no plate warping, no post-build stress-relief), and build rates are 2–3× L-PBF on the same Ti volume.
Pick EBM for large monolithic Ti structures, dense build plates, and orthopedic implants where porous lattice surfaces are a design feature.
- Build volumes > 1000 cm³
- Patient-specific orthopedic implants
- Parts where residual-stress distortion has been a recurring issue
Tradeoffs vs L-PBF
Surface finish is Ra 20–35 µm vs L-PBF's 6–15 µm. Minimum wall is ~0.8 mm vs L-PBF's 0.4 mm. The coarser melt pool also limits the smallest printable feature to ~0.6 mm.
Fatigue allowables sit slightly below L-PBF for the same condition, dominated by surface roughness. Machine the fatigue-critical surfaces and the gap closes.
Post-processing
No stress-relief is needed — the elevated chamber takes care of it.
- Powder removal: blast in a PRS
- HIP: 920 °C / 100 MPa / 2 h
- Surface: machine critical features; chemical mill for general finish
- Optional: alpha-case removal if any open-air post-bake occurred
Suggested EBM parameters
GE Additive Arcam Q20+ starting recipe at 70 µm layer.
- Layer thickness: 70 µm
- Beam current: 15 mA
- Scan speed: 4500 mm/s
- Pre-heat: 700 °C chamber
- Vacuum: < 5 × 10⁻⁴ mbar
Frequently asked questions
Does EBM produce stronger parts than L-PBF?
About the same UTS, slightly higher elongation, slightly lower as-built fatigue (driven by surface roughness). After HIP and machining, the two converge.
Can EBM print thin walls?
Reliably down to ~0.8 mm. Below that, use L-PBF.
Sources
- ASTM F2924 — AM Ti-6Al-4V
- GE Additive Arcam Q20+ datasheet
- MMPDS-2024 Chapter 5