Process comparisons
Head-to-head decision matrices for the AM process choices that come up most often in design reviews — written for engineers picking a path, not promoting a vendor.
L-PBF wins on fine-feature replacements with tight tolerance; DED wins on near-net repair, large envelopes, and material flexibility on the same build.
Binder jetting wins on throughput and unit cost above ~200 parts; L-PBF wins on density, fatigue allowables, and qualification maturity.
EBM wins on residual stress and bulk Ti throughput; L-PBF wins on surface finish, feature resolution, and broader OEM availability.
WAAM wins on raw deposition rate and feedstock cost; DED-powder wins on resolution, alloy breadth, and machining allowance.
Skip the matrix — let the wizard rank for your part
The wizard evaluates every viable process × material for your CAD and ranks them on cost, lead time, and allowables in one pass.